Genetic relation of lobular carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ, and associated invasive carcinoma of the breast

H Buerger¹, R Simon¹, K-L Schäfer¹, R Diallo¹, R Littmann¹, C Poremba¹, P J van Diest², B Dockhorn-Dworniczak¹ and W Böcker¹

¹ Gerhard-Domagk- Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
² Institute of Pathology, Free University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Professor Böcker email: boeckew{at}uni-muenster.de

Aims—The mutual relation of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, as accepted precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer, is controversial. Because they display genetic heterogeneity, it is not clear how genetically advanced these entities are and what causes the transition to an invasive carcinoma.

Methods—Six cases of LCIS, four of them with associated lobular invasive carcinoma, four cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with an associated invasive lobular carcinoma, and nine cases of intermediately and poorly differentiated DCIS with associated ductal invasive carcinoma were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) after microdissection and immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin.

Results—LCIS was characterised by a low average rate of copy number changes, no evidence of amplifications, and a high rate of gains and losses of chromosomal material at 1q and 16q, respectively. A high degree of genetic homology with well differentiated DCIS was obvious, as reported previously. The cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with associated lobular invasive components and lobular differentiation revealed striking homologies, and a significant difference of E-cadherin expression. The comparison of preinvasive and invasive breast lesions, irrespective of differentiation within the same patient, revealed no specific alteration that might be associated with invasion. Genetic alterations seen in invasive carcinoma were not necessarily seen in the adjacent precursor lesions.

Conclusions—These results provide strong evidence that invasive breast cancer is a disease with multiple cytogenetic subclones already present in preinvasive lesions. Moreover, specific CGH alterations associated with invasion were not observed. Furthermore, the close genetic association between well differentiated and a subgroup of intermediately differentiated DCIS and LCIS led to the hypothesis that LCIS and a subgroup of DCIS are different phenotypic forms of a common genotype.

Key Words: lobular carcinoma in situ • ductal carcinoma in situ • invasion

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hugh, J., Hanson, J., Cheang, M. C. U., Nielsen, T. O., Perou, C. M., Dumontet, C., Reed, J., Krajewska, M., Treilleux, I., Rupin, M., Magherini, E., Mackey, J., Martin, M., Vogel, C. (2009). Breast Cancer Subtypes and Response to Docetaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Use of an Immunohistochemical Definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial. JCO 27: 1168-1176 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reis-Filho, J. S, Pinder, S. E (2007). Non-operative breast pathology: lobular neoplasia. J. Clin. Pathol. 60: 1321-1327 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tot, T. (2007). The Theory of the Sick Breast Lobe and the Possible Consequences. INT J SURG PATHOL 15: 369-375 [Abstract]  
• Packeisen, J, Nakachi, K, Boecker, W, Brandt, B, Buerger, H (2005). Cytogenetic differences in breast cancer samples between German and Japanese patients. J. Clin. Pathol. 58: 1101-1103 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Arpino, G., Laucirica, R., Elledge, R. M. (2005). Premalignant and In Situ Breast Disease: Biology and Clinical Implications. ANN INTERN MED 143: 446-457 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Iacoangeli, A., Lin, Y., Morley, E. J., Muslimov, I. A., Bianchi, R., Reilly, J., Weedon, J., Diallo, R., Bocker, W., Tiedge, H. (2004). BC200 RNA in invasive and preinvasive breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 25: 2125-2133 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lacroix, M, Toillon, R-A, Leclercq, G (2004). Stable 'portrait' of breast tumors during progression: data from biology, pathology and genetics. Endocr Relat Cancer 11: 497-522 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhao, H., Langerod, A., Ji, Y., Nowels, K. W., Nesland, J. M., Tibshirani, R., Bukholm, I. K., Karesen, R., Botstein, D., Borresen-Dale, A.-L., Jeffrey, S. S. (2004). Different Gene Expression Patterns in Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 2523-2536 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Meeker, A. K., Hicks, J. L., Gabrielson, E., Strauss, W. M., De Marzo, A. M., Argani, P. (2004). Telomere Shortening Occurs in Subsets of Normal Breast Epithelium as well as in Situ and Invasive Carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol. 164: 925-935 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weiss, M M, Kuipers, E J, Meuwissen, S G M, van Diest, P J, Meijer, G A (2003). Comparative genomic hybridisation as a supportive tool in diagnostic pathology. J. Clin. Pathol. 56: 522-527 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chan, N P H, Ng, M H L, Cheng, S H, Lee, V, Tsang, K S, Lau, T T, Li, C K (2002). Hereditary duplication of proximal chromosome 1q (q11q22) in a patient with T lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukaemia: a family study using G banding and comparative genomic hybridisation. J. Med. Genet. 39: e79-79 [Full Text]  
• Rieger-Christ, K M, Pezza, J A, Dugan, J M, Braasch, J W, Hughes, K S, Summerhayes, I C (2001). Disparate E-cadherin mutations in LCIS and associated invasive breast carcinomas. Mol. Pathol. 54: 91-97 [Abstract] [Full Text]