|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1 Gerhard-Domagk- Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
2 Institute of Pathology, Free University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Professor Böcker email: boeckew{at}uni-muenster.de
AimsThe mutual relation of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, as accepted precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer, is controversial. Because they display genetic heterogeneity, it is not clear how genetically advanced these entities are and what causes the transition to an invasive carcinoma.
MethodsSix cases of LCIS, four of them with associated lobular invasive carcinoma, four cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with an associated invasive lobular carcinoma, and nine cases of intermediately and poorly differentiated DCIS with associated ductal invasive carcinoma were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) after microdissection and immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin.
ResultsLCIS was characterised by a low average rate of copy number changes, no evidence of amplifications, and a high rate of gains and losses of chromosomal material at 1q and 16q, respectively. A high degree of genetic homology with well differentiated DCIS was obvious, as reported previously. The cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with associated lobular invasive components and lobular differentiation revealed striking homologies, and a significant difference of E-cadherin expression. The comparison of preinvasive and invasive breast lesions, irrespective of differentiation within the same patient, revealed no specific alteration that might be associated with invasion. Genetic alterations seen in invasive carcinoma were not necessarily seen in the adjacent precursor lesions.
ConclusionsThese results provide strong evidence that invasive breast cancer is a disease with multiple cytogenetic subclones already present in preinvasive lesions. Moreover, specific CGH alterations associated with invasion were not observed. Furthermore, the close genetic association between well differentiated and a subgroup of intermediately differentiated DCIS and LCIS led to the hypothesis that LCIS and a subgroup of DCIS are different phenotypic forms of a common genotype.
Key Words: lobular carcinoma in situ ductal carcinoma in situ invasion
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S Reis-Filho and S. E Pinder Non-operative breast pathology: lobular neoplasia J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1321 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tot The Theory of the Sick Breast Lobe and the Possible Consequences International Journal of Surgical Pathology, October 1, 2007; 15(4): 369 - 375. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Packeisen, K Nakachi, W Boecker, B Brandt, and H Buerger Cytogenetic differences in breast cancer samples between German and Japanese patients J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2005; 58(10): 1101 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Arpino, R. Laucirica, and R. M. Elledge Premalignant and In Situ Breast Disease: Biology and Clinical Implications Ann Intern Med, September 20, 2005; 143(6): 446 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Iacoangeli, Y. Lin, E. J. Morley, I. A. Muslimov, R. Bianchi, J. Reilly, J. Weedon, R. Diallo, W. Bocker, and H. Tiedge BC200 RNA in invasive and preinvasive breast cancer Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2125 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Lacroix, R-A Toillon, and G Leclercq Stable 'portrait' of breast tumors during progression: data from biology, pathology and genetics Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 497 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhao, A. Langerod, Y. Ji, K. W. Nowels, J. M. Nesland, R. Tibshirani, I. K. Bukholm, R. Karesen, D. Botstein, A.-L. Borresen-Dale, et al. Different Gene Expression Patterns in Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2004; 15(6): 2523 - 2536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Meeker, J. L. Hicks, E. Gabrielson, W. M. Strauss, A. M. De Marzo, and P. Argani Telomere Shortening Occurs in Subsets of Normal Breast Epithelium as well as in Situ and Invasive Carcinoma Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2004; 164(3): 925 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M M Weiss, E J Kuipers, S G M Meuwissen, P J van Diest, and G A Meijer Comparative genomic hybridisation as a supportive tool in diagnostic pathology J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2003; 56(7): 522 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N P H Chan, M H L Ng, S H Cheng, V Lee, K S Tsang, T T Lau, and C K Li Hereditary duplication of proximal chromosome 1q (q11q22) in a patient with T lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukaemia: a family study using G banding and comparative genomic hybridisation J. Med. Genet., December 1, 2002; 39(12): e79 - 79. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K M Rieger-Christ, J A Pezza, J M Dugan, J W Braasch, K S Hughes, and I C Summerhayes Disparate E-cadherin mutations in LCIS and associated invasive breast carcinomas Mol. Pathol., April 1, 2001; 54(2): 91 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| Molecular Pathology | Journal of Clinical Pathology |