Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Molecular Pathology 2001;54:264-269; doi:10.1136/mp.54.4.264
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
J Clin Pathol: Mol Pathol 2001; 54:264-269
© 2001 Journal of Clinical Pathology

Epstein-Barr virus infection in paediatric liver transplant recipients: detection of the virus in post-transplant tonsillectomy specimens

N Meru1, S Davison2, L Whitehead3, A Jung1, D Mutimer4, N Rooney5, D Kelly2 and G Niedobitek1

1 Pathologisches Institut, Friedrich-Alexander- Universität, Krankenhausstr. 8—10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
2 Liver Unit, Birmingham Childrens Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK
3 Department of Pathology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
4 Liver and Hepatobiliary Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
5 Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal United Hospital, Bath BA1 3NG, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Niedobitek gerald.niedobitek{at}patho.imed.uni-erlangen.de

Aims—Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is an important and serious complication in transplant patients. Recent studies have suggested that quantitative assessment of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in transplant patients might help to identify those at risk of developing PTLD. Therefore, tonsils from paediatric liver transplant recipients were studied for evidence of EBV infection.

Methods—Tonsils were studied by in situ hybridisation for the detection of the small EBV encoded nuclear RNAs (EBERs). The phenotype of EBV infected cells was determined by double labelling in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry. The expression of viral latent and lytic antigens was determined by immunohistochemistry. Tonsils from patients without known immune defects were studied as controls.

Results—Tonsils from transplant patients showed pronounced follicular hyperplasia and minor paracortical hyperplasia. In situ hybridisation revealed variable numbers of EBV infected B cells in the tonsils from transplant patients (range, 2–1000/0.5 cm2; mean, 434/0.5 cm2; median, 105/0.5 cm2). Lower numbers were detected in the control tonsils (range, 1–200/0.5 cm2; mean, 47/0.5 cm2; median, 9/0.5 cm2). The latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) of EBV was not detected and there were only rare cells in two cases showing expression of the EBV encoded nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2). There was no evidence of lytic infection. None of the patients developed PTLD within a follow up period of up to five years.

Conclusions—These data indicate that tonsillar enlargement in paediatric liver transplant patients does not necessarily imply a diagnosis of PTLD. Furthermore, the presence of increased numbers of EBV infected cells in tonsils from liver transplant recipients by itself does not indicate an increased risk of developing PTLD.

Key Words: Epstein-Barr virus • transplantation • lymphoproliferative disease • tonsil


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs