Molecular Pathology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Mulla, F
Right arrow Articles by Varadharaj, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Mulla, F
Right arrow Articles by Varadharaj, G
Molecular Pathology 2003;56:210-217
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. & Association of Clinical Pathologists


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Expressive genomic hybridisation: gene expression profiling at the cytogenetic level

F Al-Mulla1, M Al-Maghrebi2 and G Varadharaj1

1 Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Unit, Kuwait University, Faculty of Medicine, PO Box 24923, Safat, Kuwait 13110
2 Department of Biochemistry, Kuwait University, Faculty of Medicine

Correspondence to:
Dr F Al-Mulla, Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Unit, Kuwait University, Faculty of Medicine, PO Box 24923, Safat, Kuwait 13110;
almulla{at}hsc.kuniv.edu.kw

Aims: To describe a cytogenetic technique suitable for the rapid assessment of global gene expression that is based on comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH), and to use it to understand the relation between genetic amplifications and gene expression.

Methods: Whereas traditional CGH uses DNA as test and reference in hybridisations, expressive genomic hybridisation (EGH) uses globally amplified mRNA as test and normal DNA as reference. EGH is a rapid and powerful tool for localising and studying global gene expression profiles and correlating them with loci of genetic amplifications using traditional CGH.

Results: EGH was used to correlate genetic amplifications detected by CGH with the expression profile of two independent cell lines—Colo320 and T47D. Although many amplifications resulted in overexpression, other amplifications were partially or completely silenced at the cytogenetic level.

Conclusion: This technique will assist in the analysis of overexpressed genes within amplicons and could resolve a controversial issue in cancer cytogenetics; namely, the relation between genetic amplifications and overexpression.


Keywords: comparative genomic hybridisation; expressive genomic hybridisation; cytogenetics; amplifications; expression

Abbreviations: CGH, comparative genomic hybridisation; DOP, degenerate oligonucleotide primer; EGH, expressive genomic hybridisation; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SSC, saline sodium citrate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Molecular Pathology Journal of Clinical Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.