Molecular Pathology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Molecular Pathology 2003;56:317
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


ECHO

Toxins are linked to cancer of the bile duct

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The first study to test for DNA adducts as a marker for intrahepatic cancer of the bile duct has lent more support to the hypothesis that toxins damaging DNA lead to cancer. Greater exposure to environmental toxins may explain the rapid rise in deaths from this cancer in Western countries over the past 30 years, suggest the authors.

Patients with the cancer had more DNA adducts in samples of their tumour or adjacent to their tumour than patients without (median relative amounts/108 nucleotides: tumour DNA 7.2 (range 1.8–48.4); tumour adjacent DNA 8.6 (1.2–51.6) v non-cancer DNA 2.9 (0.6–11.5)). The pattern and density of DNA adducts differed between tumour DNA and tumour adjacent DNA and between each of these and non-cancer DNA.

Tumour tissue was taken from 32 men with primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and tumour adjacent tissue from 28 of them. Cystic ducts were obtained from seven cancer free patients during . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Molecular Pathology Journal of Clinical Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.